It happens in most major cities – the fight between historic preservation and progress. What do we need to save to remind us of our past? What do we need to discard to make way for the future?
Come to think of it, I have that same battle in my closet at home!
In Midtown Memphis, the battle rages over the preservation of empty and abandoned buildings, no longer located in desirable economic locations, no longer suitable to modern-day purposes.
Sure, one of the buildings in question was the second restaurant in the TGIFriday’s chain, but the restaurant moved to a more desirable location and the parent company has no interest in making the Memphis location a shrine.
The latest battle surrounds a United Methodist Church.
Once the flagship of the Annual Conference, in recent times the membership has declined to a mere handful, who have now prayerfully given up their location and merged with another congregation. And although the church is listed on someone’s Historic Register, and the sanctuary reportedly has “the best acoustics in Memphis”, the rest of the building is inaccessible, outdated, in need of significant repair, and in an undesirable location.
Bottom line is, nobody wants it.
Or, rather, nobody can afford the necessary repairs and renovations to make it useable again. So there is a possibility it will be torn down to make way for a big-box retail store.
What is worth preserving? Who gets to decide?
As California continues an ongoing budget crisis, and Los Angeles is threatened with bankruptcy, budgets are being cut and services are being reduced. The L.A. Times recently reported that one such budget cut threatens the famous Watts Towers.
I remember reading about the Watts Towers when I was a kid. I was inspired.
In the midst of a neighborhood known today mostly for riots and gang activity during the mid-60s and 70s, the towers were built over the course of 33 years (1921-1954) by an Italian immigrant named Sabato Rodia. The 17 spires surrounded his bungalow in the Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles. They are a work of art, and have been hailed as such by art critics around the world.
Unfortunately, his neighbors did not necessarily see it that way. The looming spires, one reaching as high as 100 feet tall, were decorated with broken glass and pottery shards, seashells and ceramic tile. During WWII, paranoid neighbors accused Rodia of building radio towers to communicate with the Japanese. They turned their children loose to vandalize the towers.
In 1955, Rodia gave the property away and moved to a safer, quieter neighborhood. The property changed hands several times, and at one point the city of Los Angeles was determined to raze the structure. But supporters of the towers protested, and the city set up a stress-test to see if the towers were stable. A crane, pulling with lateral force, was unable to budge them, and ultimately the crane experienced a mechanical breakdown. The towers were saved.
In 1975, the site was deeded to the city of Los Angeles, and in 1978 given to the State of California. The Watts Towers are now on the National Register of Historic Places, and designated a National Historic Landmark.
Unfortunately, the structures require regular maintenance, and that requires money… which the State of California does not have. The City of Los Angeles is cutting the budget of the Department of Cultural Affairs, so barely $200,000 will be available next year to make $5 million in deferred maintenance.
The towers’ curator has also been cut from the budget.
Are the Watts Towers truly worth saving? Or is it a relic from the past that needs to go to make way for progress?
For those unfamiliar with the area, there is no progress scheduled to be made in Watts right now.
Fortunately, the LA County Museum of Art believes the towers are worth saving, and are stepping up to help with preservation work and fund raising.
And isn’t that really the answer to the question? Someone’s got to pay the cost of preservation. So if you want to keep something around, YOU buy it. YOU maintain it. Keep it in YOUR attic, not mine.
Yes, it is terrible when an historic property is razed and replaced by a Chic-fil-a. And I sometimes get fed up with the "gleaming cities of tomorrow".
But it is much worse to see long-abandoned buildings left to collapse under the weight of pigeon poop simply because once they were listed on an historic registry.
If no one wants it, put something useful in its place.
I hope someone will do me the same courtesy when I get old and dilapidated.